Polite Character from a Multicultural Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rise of globalization and increasing cultural diversity in modern societies pose complex challenges in shaping polite character, which is considered universal but varies significantly across cultures. This study aims to explore the characteristics of polite behavior from multiple cultural perspectives, evaluate its application in multicultural education, identify factors influencing its development, and investigate the integration of universal politeness with local cultural values. A qualitative approach was employed through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA protocol. Literature was sourced from Scopus and Google Scholar, focusing on Q1–Q4 journals published between 2020 and 2025 in Indonesian and English. The review of ten cross-cultural studies revealed diverse politeness strategies across regions—from East Asia to Africa—highlighting ten influential factors, including cultural orientation, social status, relational closeness, and pragmatic competence. The findings show that politeness is not a fixed construct but a culturally contextual phenomenon, necessitating holistic and adaptive strategies in multicultural education. This study concludes that integrating universal values with cultural particularities requires intercultural pragmatic competence and culturally responsive pedagogy. These findings offer both theoretical and practical contributions to character education, emphasizing the importance of balancing global standards with local wisdom in fostering social harmony.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ackermann, T. (2023). Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests. Journal of Politeness Research, 19(2), 355–389.
Alqahtani, H. (2024). Applying Brown and Levinson’s model to investigate the differences in the use of politeness strategies between spoken Saudi and British English. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(4), 57–73.
Arvanitis, E. (2018). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Modeling teachers' professional learning to advance plurilingualism. Handbook of research and practice in heritage language education, 245-262.
Asar, Sh., Jalalpour, Sh., Ayoubi, F., Rahmani, M. R., & Rezaeian, M. (2016). PRISMA; Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 15(1), 68–80.
Azhari, D. S., Sipahutar, R. E., Kalsum, U., & Syahri, P. (2024). Multicultural education and the significance of education. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(03), 1101–1108.
Badri, L. S., & Malik, A. A. (2024). Implementation of Islamic education values in building students’ religious character through an affective approach based on the Qur’an. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 217–233.
Barany, L. K. (2016). Language awareness, intercultural awareness and communicative language teaching: Towards language education. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(4).
Benyakoub, N. E. H., Alghazo, S., Altakhaineh, A. R. M., & Rabab’ah, G. (2022). A cross-cultural analysis of disagreement strategies in Algerian and Jordanian Arabic. Kervan, 26(1), 253–275.
Chen, H. J., Lin, H. I., & Chen, P. Y. (2025). The relationship of parent involvement, motivational resilience, flourishing, and academic performance: A comparison of new immigrant and non-immigrant adolescents in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 651–682.
Culpeper, J., & Pat, K. (2021). Compliment responses in Hong Kong: An application of Leech’s pragmatics of politeness. Text & Talk, 41(5-6), 667–690.
Culpeper, J., & Tantucci, V. (2021). The principle of (im)politeness reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 146–164.
Guberina, T. (2023). Cultivating inclusive learning environments: Incorporating diversity through culturally responsive pedagogy. Social Science Chronicle, 2(1), 1-14.
Hu, Y. (2021). Relational work in dispute: Negotiating norms, negotiating relationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(2), 133–154.
Jakučionytė, V. (2020). Cross-cultural communication: Creativity and politeness strategies across cultures. A comparison of Lithuanian and American cultures. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 164–178.
Kádár, D., & House, J. (2021). ‘Politeness markers’ revisited - a contrastive pragmatic perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(1), 79–109.
Kecskes, I. (2017). Context-dependency and impoliteness in intercultural communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 7-31.
Kirner-Ludwig, M., & Alsaedi, R. F. (2021). A pragmatics-based appeal to saving face so as to save lives: On intercultural pragmatic awareness (or rather: Lack thereof) in a handbook for US soldiers deployed for Iraq. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(3), 225–253.
Maddux, W. W., Lu, J. G., Affinito, S. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020). Multicultural experiences: A systematic review and new theoretical framework. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 345–376.
Mamat, R., Abdul Rashid, R., & Paee, R. (2021). Element of politeness in intercultural communication: The case study of Japanese and Malaysian tourists. WILAYAH: The International Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), 58–75.
Mariyono, D. (2024). Indonesian mosaic: The essential need for multicultural education. Quality Education for All, 1(1), 301–325.
Mayrita, H., Rahmawati, S., Sholikhah, H. A., Wongprakob, W., Hidayat, M., Fortunasari, F., & Marzulina, L. (2025). Language politeness in digital streaming: The implications to education and ethics in communications for the technological era. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 1079–1090.
Nurramadhani, A., Patras, Y. E., Ghani, R. A., Tatemoto, Y., Anggraeni, R. C., & Sisworo, A. F. (2025). Culturally responsive teaching: An approach to cultivate students' global diversity character. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 17(1), 104-112.
Revita, I., Oktavianus, O., Anindya Zalfikhe, F., & Syaputri, W. (2025). Cultural nuances in pre-request speech acts: A pragmatic analysis of the Minangkabau language. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1).
Sarwari, A. Q., Adnan, H. M., Rahamad, M. S., & Abdul Wahab, M. N. (2024). The requirements and importance of intercultural communication competence in the 21st century. SAGE Open, 14(2).
Sikhwari, M. G. (2025). A sociolinguistic analysis of gratitude expressions in Tshivenḓa. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 43, 1–10.
Soomro, M. A., & Larina, T. (2024). Addressing practices in multilingual student-teacher interaction in Pakistani English. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(2), 202–217.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
Tran, T. B. (2022). A cross-cultural study of modality in the speech act of asking for permission. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(5), 854–865.
Valiandes, S., Neophytou, L., & Hajisoteriou, C. (2018). Establishing a framework for blending intercultural education with differentiated instruction. Intercultural Education, 29(3), 379-398.
Virtanen, T., & Lee, C. (2022). Face-work in online discourse: Practices and multiple conceptualizations. Journal of Pragmatics, 195, 1–6.
Waddington, C., van Veenendaal, N. R., O’Brien, K., Patel, N., & International Steering Committee for Family Integrated Care. (2021). Family integrated care: Supporting parents as primary caregivers in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatric Investigation, 5(2), 148–154.
Ward, C., Kim, I., & Stuart, J. (2025). Diversity-receptiveness in higher education: Perceived multicultural norms, well-being and attitudes toward international students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 83.
Ying, J., & Hong, G. (2020). A cross-cultural comparative study of requests made in Chinese by South Korean and French learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 54–65.